New Study Shows Human Input on Public Service AI Can Increase Citizen Acceptance

New Study Shows Human Input on Public Service AI Can Increase Citizen Acceptance

According to the findings of a recent study, increasing the amount of human involvement in the process of deploying AI for public services can have a positive impact on the acceptance of this technology.

According to TechXplore, the findings of the study demonstrate that citizens’ concerns extend further than the fairness of artificial intelligence and include the possibility of biases resulting from human inputs.

According to the findings of the study, citizens tend to be more open to the use of AI when they believe that administrative discretion is being exercised in an excessively broad manner.

Laszlo Horvath from Birkbeck, University of London, was the primary researcher on this project. He worked closely with Oliver James, Susan Banducci, and Ana Beduschi from the University of Exeter.

AI Involvement

AI Involvement

Individuals in the UK were asked to respond to a survey in which they were tasked with indicating their preferences regarding the extent to which AI should be involved in the procedures associated with the handling of immigration visas and parking permits. The survey involved 2,143 participants.

According to the findings, a higher level of human participation was generally correlated with a greater level of acceptance of AI. In situations, however, in which a significant amount of human discretion was involved in the processing of parking permits, respondents tended to favor less human intervention overall.

Elements at the level of the system, such as a high level of accuracy, the availability of an appeals process, increased transparency, reduced costs, the non-sharing of data, and the absence of involvement from private companies, all contributed to an increased level of acceptance and a sense of procedural fairness that was perceived by the public.

Horvath stated that their findings imply a resistance to the accumulation and sharing of data pertaining to citizens, and they said that the findings suggest this resistance. However, in the context of other characteristics at the level of the system, they observed that citizens desire functional technology and, in such cases, are open to a reduced level of human oversight. This finding was made in light of the fact that other characteristics are at the level of the system.

Banducci went on to say that the findings contribute to a better understanding of how people accept technology in areas such as digital government and AI. Citizens who may initially be resistant to new technologies appear to prefer increased human administrative involvement in a variety of contexts.

Read More: TikTok, Snapchat to Remove AI-Generated Child Abuse Images

Relevance to Government Services

James emphasized that their findings have broad relevance to government services that use AI, as many routine interactions with the government involve permit applications similar to those that they examined. This is because many routine interactions with the government involve the use of AI.

“Many routine interactions with the government involve permit applications similar to the kinds we examined such that the findings are of broad relevance to government services using AI,” James commented in a statement to the press.

“People seemed to care less about “humans in the loop,” openness, or even data sharing and more about how much the technology cost and how accurate it was. “This suggests that people may have a deeper understanding of legitimacy when it comes to how well the system works and how accurate and inexpensive the results are,” he said.

The study is important because AI can solve important problems, even though there are still concerns about it. It tells us a lot about how people feel about and accept AI in public services, which shows us how important human participation and system-level factors are.

Read More: 3 things to know before writing AI